首页> 外文OA文献 >Co-registration of cone-beam CT and planning CT in head & neck IMRT dose estimation:a feasible adaptive radiotherapy strategy
【2h】

Co-registration of cone-beam CT and planning CT in head & neck IMRT dose estimation:a feasible adaptive radiotherapy strategy

机译:头颈IMRT剂量估算中锥形束CT和计划CT的共配准:可行的自适应放射治疗策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective:To investigate if cone beam CT (CBCT) can be used to estimate the delivered dose in head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods:15 patients (10 without replan and 5 with replan) were identified retrospectively. Weekly CBCT was co-registered with original planning CT. Original high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1), low-dose CTV (CTV2), brainstem, spinal cord, parotids and external body contours were copied to each CBCT and modified to account for anatomical changes. Corresponding planning target volumes (PTVs) and planning organ-at-risk volumes were created. The original plan was applied and calculated using modified per-treatment volumes on the original CT. Percentage volumetric, cumulative (planned dose delivered prior to CBCT + adaptive dose delivered after CBCT) and actual delivered (summation of weekly adaptive doses) dosimetric differences between each per-treatment and original plan were calculated.Results:There was greater volumetric change in the parotids with an average weekly difference of between −4.1% and −27.0% compared with the CTVs/PTVs (−1.8% to −5.0%). The average weekly cumulative dosimetric differences were as follows: CTV/PTV (range, −3.0% to 2.2%), ipsilateral parotid volume receiving ≥26 Gy (V26) (range, 0.5–3.2%) and contralateral V26 (range, 1.9–6.3%). In patients who required replan, the average volumetric reductions were greater: CTV1 (−2.5%), CTV2 (−6.9%), PTV1 (−4.7%), PTV2 (−11.5%), ipsilateral (−10.4%) and contralateral parotids (−12.1%), but did not result in significant dosimetric changes.Conclusion:The dosimetric changes during head and neck simultaneous integrated boost IMRT do not necessitate adaptive radiotherapy in most patients.Advances in knowledge:Our study shows that CBCT could be used for dose estimation during head and neck IMRT.
机译:目的:探讨锥束CT(CBCT)是否可用于估算头颈部调强放射治疗(IMRT)的剂量。方法:回顾性鉴定15例患者(10例无重新计划,5例重新计划)。每周CBCT与原始计划CT共同注册。将原始的高剂量临床目标体积(CTV1),低剂量CTV(CTV2),脑干,脊髓,腮腺和体外轮廓复制到每个CBCT中,并进行修改以适应解剖学变化。创建了相应的计划目标数量(PTV)和计划风险机构的数量。应用原始计划,并在原始CT上使用修改后的每次治疗量进行计算。计算了每次治疗与原始计划之间的体积百分比,累计剂量(CBCT之前的计划剂量+ CBCT之后的适应剂量)和实际递送(每周适应剂量之和)的剂量学差异。结果:与CTV / PTV相比(-1.8%至-5.0%)的腮腺平均每周差异在-4.1%和-27.0%之间。每周的平均累积剂量差异如下:CTV / PTV(范围-3.0%至2.2%),患侧腮腺体积≥26 Gy(V26)(范围0.5-3.2%)和对侧V26(范围1.9-1.9) 6.3%)。在需要重新计划的患者中,平均容积减少更大:CTV1(−2.5%),CTV2(−6.9%),PTV1(−4.7%),PTV2(−11.5%),同侧(−10.4%)和对侧腮腺(-12.1%),但并未导致明显的剂量学改变。结论:大多数患者在头颈部同时进行综合增强IMRT期间的剂量学改变无需进行适应性放疗。知识进步:我们的研究表明CBCT可用于头颈IMRT期间的剂量估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号